Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Hockey > Hurricanes > Rules interpret...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 572 of 590
Post > Topic >>

Rules interpretation question

by Jerry Heyman <jerry@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 1, 2008 at 09:22 PM

I attended the game at the RBC on New Years Eve, and my son, wife, and
I are confused about a penalty situation that occurred almost midway in
the third period.

A delayed penalty was being called against the Islanders when a bit
of pu****ng/shoving match then occurred between the Islanders' Bergenheim
and the Hurricanes' LaRose.  After penalties were *****sed, it was
announced that Bergenheim got a double-minor (kneeing and roughing)
and LaRose got a minor (for roughing).  At that point I would have
assumed that the teams would skate 4 on 4 for two minutes, and then
the Hurricanes would have a 2min powerplay.

Instead, a second Islander was put in penalty box, 2min for LaRose
AND 2min for the 2nd player were put on the board.  Carolina then
skated with a 5 on 4 powerplay (not 4 on 3 as I would have expected
with two men in the Islander box).  

When the 2min was up, LaRose and the 2nd Islander were freed from the
penalty box, but Bergenheim continued to sit in the box.  At this point
there was no penalty on the board, and both teams were skating 5 aside.

In looking at the box score, I can find nothing that indicates WHY
two Islanders were in the box, or why Bergenheim stayed in at least
an additional 2min.  I had assumed that the 2nd player was in the box
to work off Bergenheim's kneeing penalty, and that once the two min
were done, he would have been eligible to come back out.

I have 35+yrs of hockey fandom under my belt, and I'm still trying
to figure out what happened...

jerry
-- 
       //  Jerry Heyman      | "Software is the difference between
      //   Amiga Forever :-) |  hardware and reality"
  \\ //    heymanj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   | 
   \X/     http://bellsouthpwp.net/h/e/heymanj/
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Rules interpretation question
Jerry Heyman <jerry@[E  2008-01-01 21:22:28 
Re: Rules interpretation question
Cynicor <j...tru.p..in  2008-01-02 07:29:47 
Re: Rules interpretation question
Bob Levine <fake@[EMAI  2008-01-02 13:35:07 
Re: Rules interpretation question
Jerry Heyman <jerry@[E  2008-01-02 21:16:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 12:27:20 CDT 2008.